Gospel Reflections for Life-Promotion

INTRODUCING FR. FREDDIE'S GOSPEL REFLECTIONS

for Multi-purpose

1. These reflections are not written like an essay, but in six precise steps. Choose what you like.

2. They are not meant only for preaching homilies, but for a multi-purpose: for teaching, prayer (either personal or common), reflections and socio-pastoral guidance.

3. They can be used outside the liturgical celebrations also on any other occasions for preaching (by using the same text), private and common prayers, Bible Vigil, Adoration, Prayer Service, Gospel Sharing, conferences, talks, etc.

4. Only the Gospel text prescribed for the Sunday Liturgy in the Catholic Church is used for these reflections, and not the First and Second Readings. The latter are quoted only for reference. Those who want to include them, have to find their own applications.

5. These reflections are written from a pastoral and spiritual perspective, and not from academic or exegetical.

6. The preachers have an option to develop only the focus-statements given in Step 2 on their own into a full-fledged homily. If they want to make their homily shorter, they need not include all the points/thoughts written by the author; instead can select what they like, and (if they want) add their own stories/ anecdotes/ examples.

7. The title, “Gospel Reflections for Life-Promotion” indicates the author’s intention to highlight the life-sustaining or life-saving issues in our world and society in the midst of anti-life forces.

8. Though much of the material presented in these reflections is author's, no claim is made for the originality of all the thoughts and ideas. They are adopted from various authors.

9. Reproduction of these reflections in any form needs prior permission.

Wednesday, 27 September 2023

26th Sunday of Ordinary Time (A)

 

Twenty-sixth Sunday of Ordinary Time (A) [Mt 21:28-32]

01.10.2023

The Parable of the Two Sons

Readings: (1) Ez 18:25-28 (2) Phil 2:1-11

1.  Theme in brief

Change of mind from ‘no’ to ‘yes’

2.  Focus Statement  

Even the worst sinners, in spite of their obstinate persistence in sins, and frequent refusal to God’s grace in the past, can change their minds and become good persons.

3.   Explanation of the text

This Parable of the Two Sons proclaims God’s mercy to sinners and justifies Jesus’ own ministry of forgiving and accepting them. Addressed to the chief priests and elders of Israel (21:23), this parable exposes their guilt. Among the two sons mentioned in the parable, one responded negatively, one positively. The first son changed from bad to good, but the second one did not change at all! Jesus likened the second son to the religious leaders of Israel (chief priests, scribes, Pharisees and the elders) who originally agreed to the terms of God’s covenant with them but were rejecting it now. They had said ‘yes’ to God initially as his chosen people (21:30), but said ’no’ to not only John the Baptist’s call for conversion or a change of heart but also to Jesus’ call. They knew the way of God very well, because they had the revelation of God and the Law of Moses. But they never felt the desire or need for a change, since they thought they were already righteous. Saying ‘no’ to Jesus was equal to saying ‘no’ to God with all the obstinacy or stubbornness.

The first son was like the outcasts of Jewish society, namely the tax-collectors and prostitutes; because they accepted “the way of righteousness” (21:32) preached by John the Baptist. Initially they said ‘no’ to  God’s command (represented by the father in this story, 21:29) and were disobedient to the Law by living sinful lives, but later obeyed God by changing their mind (that is, by repenting and reforming their lives, 22:29). Thus, the so-called outcasts who were despised by the religious leaders believed and repented (21:32), while the latter (the “religious-minded" people) did not. The latter turned out to be faithless, and the outcasts faithful, though sinful. Therefore, Jesus makes a shocking and highly bold statement that the tax collectors and prostitutes who admit their sins and need for repentance will enter into God’s Kingdom ahead of the self-righteous Pharisees who think they have no need of repentance (21:31). Later in Matthew’s Church the Gentile Christians were considered as faithful in contrast to the faithless chosen people (Israelites), as the vast majority of them rejected Jesus’ message.

After witnessing the conversion of tax-collectors and prostitutes, the religious leaders should have been better motivated to accept their need of reform or change. Even after seeing it, they obstinately refused to repent and be converted (21:32), because they thought they were ‘religious.’ But their religiosity meant considering themselves righteous (hence needing no repentance) and despising sinners as outcasts.

Some commentators say, since this parable speaks about two sons whom the father asked to work in the vineyard, it has a connection with Isaiah 5:1-7. In that passage, Israel is compared with God’s vineyard. God did all he could for Israel such as planting and nurturing, but instead of sweet grapes, it produced wild grapes that were good for nothing. The reason was that his people promised to obey him and gave the impression of belonging to him, but miserably failed to produce what God expected. Some others point out that this parable is related to the Parable of the Prodigal Son (Lk 15:11-32). Here, the Prodigal Son is like the first son who said ‘no’ to his father initially, but later repented for his disobedience and unfaithfulness. The elder son is like the second son who said ‘yes’ to his father, but was so self-righteous that he thought he needed no repentance and his younger brother needed punishment.

4.  Application to life

Like the father of this parable, God the Father assigns each one of us to work in his ‘vineyard,’ that is, his Kingdom. The second son, who says, "I go," makes a promise but never fulfils it.  His deeds contradict his words. He is guilty of both disobedience and deception. He represents those who profess their faith in Christ, but deny him in their deeds. They appear to be pious and religious-minded on the surface level by their regular attendance at religious services or worship but their deeds do not match with their words, or they do not practise what they profess. Saying ‘yes’ to God’s will with our lips is not enough; we have to persevere in doing God’s will till the end of our lives.

There is a lot difference between our saying and doing: Sometimes we bluntly say ‘no’ to God and neighbours by sinning against both, but later when we are in our quiet moments or when we come to our senses we regret for it and change our minds like the first son. In our personal lives too, at times due to human frailty and allurement of the world we stubbornly refuse to be converted or to yield to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Later on we give a second thought to it and realize how obstinate and foolish we were in refusing the promptings of the Spirit. Then we turn back to God and begin once again to do his will. Sometimes when we are very angry with somebody, we blurt out rough, bad and threatening words. But later on we regret for behaving in that manner. When we realize our mistake, if we say sorry to such people we are like the first son of today’s parable.

Even the worst sinner, in spite of his/her obstinate persistence in sins, and frequent refusal to God’s grace in the past, can always change his/her mind and become a good person. The worst sin is the sin of hardness of hearts and refusing to be converted till the end of our lives. If a person has lost the sense of sin and does not think there is anything called ‘sin’ in this world, then where is the point of repentance? Though the Holy Spirit prompts him/her to admit his/her sins, he/she stubbornly shuts down his promptings. Jesus calls this type of sin, a blasphemy against the Holy Spirit (Mk 3:28) which can never be forgiven, because one who does not believe in sins does not feel the need of repentance till the end of one’s life. If there is no repentance, where is the question of forgiveness?

Like the second son, sometimes we say ‘yes’ and ‘yes’ in words, but they are only sweet words; we  do not keep them. It is like saying ‘yes’ with our lips and ‘no’ in our action. Some people who appear righteous, spiritual-minded and pious do not think that they also need to change. They blame their family/ community/ society/ organization/ system for all the problems, including their own failures. They think they are ok and others are not; hence others have to change. Like the scribes and Pharisees they do not feel the need to be converted at all times. According to Jesus, tax collectors and prostitutes who repent will enter into God’s Kingdom ahead of such people. They cannot enter into the Kingdom, or in plain language cannot experience the joy of God’s boundless love to a higher degree here on earth and to the fullest degree hereafter.

There are people in various fields who make a lot of promises like the second son but do not keep them. For example, when democratic nations go for elections, their politicians make so many promises to capture votes. But once they get elected they forget about those promises. In countries where corruption is high, some politicians make enough fortune for their future during their one term of office because they are afraid people may punish them for their failure to keep their promises by voting them out in the next election. Married people as well as priests make promises before God when they receive the sacraments particular to them, and the religious do the same when they profess their vows. If they fail in their fidelity, they become like the second son. All of us have made promises in our baptism to renounce evil and to live for God alone, but often we fail to keep them.

Today’s gospel-message reminds us that our fine words can never be a substitute for fine deeds. John writes in his First Letter: “Let us love not in word or speech, but in truth and action” (1Jn 3:18). It is a fact that children get influenced more by our example or deeds than by our words and oral instructions about what is right and what is wrong. That is why it is said, “Our actions speak louder than our words.” Again, one more saying also sounds so true in this context: “Values are not taught, but caught.” It is true that children/ students/ subjects catch moral, spiritual or social values from parents/ teachers/ superiors when they see them practising the values they teach with their words. For instance, if parents often tell their children not to fight among themselves, but children see their father and mother fighting openly, they fail to obey their words. When they observe them not practising what they teach, they lose respect for them. No respect, no obedience. When there is no obedience, parents, elders and teachers cry, “Gone are the days when children/students used to obey!” May be in olden days they used to obey out of fear; now if ever they obey, they will do so out of respect. And how respect is generated? Of course, by synchronizing our ‘audio’ with ‘video,’ that is, matching what they hear from us (when we teach and preach to them) with what they see in us – our personal example before them.             

This parable speaks about a change of mind twice: (1) the first son changed his mind (21:29) and went for work in spite of saying he will not; and (2)  the tax-collectors and prostitutes changed their mind and got converted but the Pharisees and the elders did not (21:32). This is what is meant by conversion – a change of mind, attitude or way of thinking. If we are always thinking negative and evil thoughts, our mind gets used to think negatively and wickedly; hence it gets programmed to that direction. It is something like an aeroplane which is fitted with an auto-pilot, that is, its engine is already programmed to run in a particular direction, speed and altitude. Unless the auto-pilot or programme is changed, it will run in the same way. Human mind also is like that. As Robin Sharma says, human mind is a wonderful servant, but a terrible master. If we do not discipline our mind and make it our servant by substituting every negative or evil thought with a positive or good thought, or change our way of thinking, our mind will become our master. Then it will become a terrible master and take us where we should not go.

Even Christian love (agape in Greek), which in the NT means primarily a concern for the good or welfare of others, is a decision of the mind to be made everyday. We need to decide to do good even to those who do not do any good to us or harm us. When our mind prompts us not to love such people, each time we need to decide to love by changing our mind just as the first son did according to today’s parable.

5.  Response to God's Word

Jesus challenges each one of us today with the opening words of this parable, “What do you think” (21:28)? Can both the sons inside us change their minds? What do you think? Do our worship, prayer and church attendance match our action and behaviour? We praise God with our lips and say that we shall do his will; in spite of it, do we follow the ways of the world? Do we give bad example to children or subordinates by not matching our words with our actions, and thus lose their respect as well as obedience? Are we not like the second son, if in meetings and discussions we speak beautiful words, make good decisions and produce thought-provoking reports, then go home and forget about them? Do we often fail to keep our promises?

6.  A prayer

O God of truth, grant that our ‘yes’ to you may not be only with our lips but also in our action. Save us from self-righteousness and hardness of heart so that we may always feel the need to repent and reform ourselves. We regret for the times we failed to keep our promises to you and to others. Give us the enlightenment, grace and courage to change our attitudes when needed. Amen.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment