Gospel Reflections for Life-Promotion

INTRODUCING FR. FREDDIE'S GOSPEL REFLECTIONS

for Multi-purpose

1. These reflections are not written like an essay, but in six precise steps. Choose what you like.

2. They are not meant only for preaching homilies, but for a multi-purpose: for teaching, prayer (either personal or common), reflections and socio-pastoral guidance.

3. They can be used outside the liturgical celebrations also on any other occasions for preaching (by using the same text), private and common prayers, Bible Vigil, Adoration, Prayer Service, Gospel Sharing, conferences, talks, etc.

4. Only the Gospel text prescribed for the Sunday Liturgy in the Catholic Church is used for these reflections, and not the First and Second Readings. The latter are quoted only for reference. Those who want to include them, have to find their own applications.

5. These reflections are written from a pastoral and spiritual perspective, and not from academic or exegetical.

6. The preachers have an option to develop only the focus-statements given in Step 2 on their own into a full-fledged homily. If they want to make their homily shorter, they need not include all the points/thoughts written by the author; instead can select what they like, and (if they want) add their own stories/ anecdotes/ examples.

7. The title, “Gospel Reflections for Life-Promotion” indicates the author’s intention to highlight the life-sustaining or life-saving issues in our world and society in the midst of anti-life forces.

8. Though much of the material presented in these reflections is author's, no claim is made for the originality of all the thoughts and ideas. They are adopted from various authors.

9. Reproduction of these reflections in any form needs prior permission.

Tuesday, 17 October 2023

29th Sunday of Ordinary Time (A)

 

Twenty-ninth Sunday of Ordinary Time (A) [Mt 22:15-21]

22.10.2023

The Question about Paying Taxes to Emperor Caesar

Readings: (1) Is 45:1.4-6 (2) 1 Thess 1:1-5

1.  Theme in brief

Obedience to God versus obedience to the State

2.  Focus Statement  

We must give to the State (‘Caesar’) the things that belong to it, and to God the things that belong to him; and only when the State goes against God’s laws, we are bound to disobey it.

3.    Explanation of the text

According to today’s gospel text, the Pharisees sent their disciples along with the Herodians to entrap Jesus about the question of paying taxes to the Roman government headed by Emperor Caesar (22:15,17). [Herodians were a group of people within Jewish society who were sympathetic to the Roman government]. Their question was whether it was lawful to pay taxes to a foreign government (22:17). If Jesus were to say: “You must pay taxes,” the Pharisees would accuse him of being a traitor who colluded with the foreign occupiers. In that case he would be branded as an enemy of the Jewish nation. If he were to say: “Do not pay at all,” the Herodians would bring a charge of subversion or sedition against him and report the matter to Caesar. For this crime he could be executed. For Jesus, the question was like a dead end!

Jesus answered their question in such a way that he could escape from their trap. He found it unsafe to clearly say either yes or no. He innocently asked them to show him a coin with which they paid their taxes (22:19). They quickly took out a denarius from their pockets which, as devout Jews, they were not supposed to carry, because it had the Emperor’s image on it. He asked them, "Whose head is this and whose title” (22:20)? In other words, whose image was printed on that coin?  And they had to admit that it was Caesar’s (22:21). He answered them by saying that they should give back to Caesar what is Caesar's due, and to God what is God's due (22:21). Greek philosophers in ancient days said that real justice implied "giving back to everyone what is their due." If so, what Jesus probably meant was, as per the principle of justice, all people, including Caesar, should get what was due to them. In other words, they must give to the State (‘Caesar’) the things that belonged to it, and not things that belonged to God (22:21). Even the State (‘Caesar’) must render to God what belongs to him and must be subjected to his laws. Thus, Jesus accepted the legitimate claims of the State over its citizens, but refused to give it divine rights. He insisted that God’s claim over us was far superior to the State’s.

By giving such an answer Jesus acknowledged that there were things that were properly under the jurisdiction of the government, and things that were not. To render to Caesar what is Caesar's, is to return his own coin to him by paying taxes and fulfilling one’s duties towards the State; to render to God what is God's is to worship and serve him alone (cf. 4:10). Jesus probably meant that the Pharisees were confusing others about what belonged to God and what belonged to the State; they were rendering to neither what belonged to them. They were not giving government its due, and were refusing God his due since they rejected Jesus’ message of God’s Kingdom.

Since they were carrying and using the offensive coin, Jesus called them hypocrites who were putting him to the test (22:18). Both the groups were paying the taxes by using the Roman coin. Thus they indirectly acknowledged the Roman authority over them. Jesus’ shrewd reply did not give any chance to either party to catch him. Though they failed in their plot at this point and faced a great deal of embarrassment, they never gave up this charge till the last moments of his life. At the time of his trial later on, one of the charges they would bring against him before Pilate would be that he forbade paying taxes to Caesar (Lk 23:2).

4.  Application to life                     

Today’s gospel text deals with some interesting questions: How to deal with the issues of conflict that may sometimes arise between God and Caesar (that is, worldly rulers and governments), the Church and the State, citizenship of this world and of the Kingdom of God. Caesar or worldly kings and governments have their own legitimate authority. All authority comes from God (Jn 19:11) and Caesar (the State) is also responsible before God for his decisions or actions and for the proper exercise of his authority. But Caesar is after all Caesar; he is not God, because he does not have almighty powers. Let him continue to rule as Caesar only, and not as God. He himself must be submissive to God and render to him what belongs to him. When some of the modern Caesars overstep their authority and put themselves in God’s place, we need not obey them. In other words, when the laws of the State go against the laws of God or against our faith and moral principles, we have to obey God and follow our conscience rather than the State.

A Christian must decide what Caesar’s domain is rightfully and what can be claimed by God alone. Who has sovereignty – government or God – over which matters? What is truly God’s, what is State’s? Let us see what we should render to God. As per our faith, "The earth is the Lord's and all that is in it" (Psalm 24:1). Since all that we are and have are God’s gifts to us, we are bound in justice to give back to God our gratitude, faithfulness, trust and submission. Our constant acts of praise and thanksgiving to God, especially in the Eucharistic celebration, are nothing but our way of paying back what we owe to God. We are called to serve and worship him with single-minded devotion and holy lives. In faith we hold that our bodies, souls, intellects, will and values are God's gift to us. We owe God all these things so that we may use them for his purposes or according to his will and for the service of our neighbour.

Similarly, all natural laws, natural justice, human and fundamental rights, freedom of speech and freedom of faith and conscience belong to God’s domain. Suppose a government denies these rights or tramples upon them, then it oversteps its limits and takes the role of God. In such matters we need not obey the State. Similarly, the mother earth and her natural resources are a gift from the Creator for our sustenance. If her resources are overused and abused by over-exploitation either by the governments or the corporate/business world, they overrule God’s own design and care for humanity. They cannot say they have a right to do what they want with God’s creation and cause ecological imbalance that threatens human existence. This is exactly what Peter and other apostles proclaimed even in the midst of persecutions in the early Church: “We must obey God rather than any human authority” (Acts 5:29), because the Jewish religious authorities were denying them the right to speak what in conscience they held to be true. 

Now the question comes: Is committed Christian discipleship opposed to being a good citizen of the State? Not at all. Practising our faith in a committed manner does not excuse us from our social and civic responsibilities, especially when they do not conflict with our total allegiance to God. Which are the things that are Caesar's? Generally speaking, the things that are Caesar's (or the State’s) are what Caesar says they are, under his legitimate authority such as taxes and public order. Whichever be the government, it is our duty to pay legitimate taxes, since they are meant for common good. We have to respect and obey lawfully constituted authority of the State (Government). On the contrary, sometimes the laws of the State may clash with God’s laws, or with Christian faith and morals. Take for instance, legalization of euthanasia, abortion, homosexual marriages, etc., by some States. In these matters, we are bound to follow our conscience rather than the State.

When a government provides needed goods and services, then we must give back to the government our loyalty and support. We should also protect public property out of concern for public good. Certain misuse/ abuse of services provided by the Government noticed in some regions are not so much against the Government or its property (as people commonly think), but against human society. For instance: directly hooking electricity from the overhead wires and using it freely to the extent of burning all the lights at daytime also; travelling freely without tickets; destroying public property, especially during riots and protests; using dubious means to evade taxes; bypassing all established rules by bribing the officials; etc. But where a government is a dictatorship that imposes itself on the people's will, the principle of justice does not demand that people give their loyalty and support. Mahatma Gandhi had launched a movement of civil disobedience against the British government that ruled India. He believed that it is morally right not to pay taxes to such a foreign government that occupies one’s nation.   

Some use this gospel text to justify unconditional loyalty and support to corrupt and totalitarian governments. When the Church criticizes such rulers or governments, they accuse her of interfering in politics. They say that all civil, economic and social affairs should be exclusive realm of the Sate and the Church as well as her ministers should stick only to spiritual affairs. When a government commands people to do what God forbids, or commands them not to do what God commands to do, should the Church or her ministers not stand for God and perform their prophetic role of raising voices in protest? Should Christians co-operate and collaborate with the government’s unjust, discriminatory and immoral decisions, policies and actions? In such instances, Christians must obey God rather than human authority, exactly as Peter had declared before his religious authorities in his days. (See above).

There is a possibility that our disobedience to Caesar in order to be faithful to God will cost a lot: We may be accused as anti-national or unpatriotic, or may have to face heavy sanctions by the government, harassment from the officials, brutality of the police, arrest, imprisonment, or even death – as it happens in some parts of the world. Christians employed in government services may not be able to go against a government’s unjust policies for the sake of safeguarding their jobs. But does it mean they should prevent their own people from protesting against violations of human rights by their government by threatening them with dire consequences? They have to answer this question before God.

It is clear that God alone has absolute claims over our lives. But, besides worldly rulers/ governments/ regimes as mentioned above, there are other powers that vie to make their claims over us or try to rule over our hearts. In modern world, consumerism and materialism can compete with our absolute loyalty to God. If not guarded, money and possessions can become our lords that dilute our absolute allegiance to God alone. We can divide our property, but we can never divide our loyalty to God. Many of our currency coins or notes are bearing the image of past political rulers or national leaders who are dead. But we should not forget that we bear the image and likeness of the living God to whom alone our life and everything else belongs.

5.  Response to God's Word

When the laws of the State go against the laws of God or against our faith and moral principles, whom do we obey: God or the State? Do we render to God what belongs to him by showing our gratitude, single-minded devotion, faithfulness, trust and submission to him? Do we render to the State what are its legitimate rights? Are we faithful to our social and civic responsibilities? Do we pay legitimate taxes to the government or try to evade them by dubious means? Do we misuse and abuse public property and public utility services?

6.  A prayer

Father, the supreme Governor of the universe, we render you all praise, honour, glory, thanksgiving and worship. All that we are and all that we have comes from you and belongs to you. To you we return everything with total gratitude and trust. Grant that we may work for common good by faithfully fulfilling our civic and social responsibilities. Bless all governments and political leaders that may govern their States with justice and truth. Give us the courage to stand firm on your laws even at the cost of disobedience to the State when it negates them. Amen.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment